According to some there will be, which is strange to hear, as the country struggles to shrug off the worst housing crash since the Great Depression. According to a CNN article, the nation is simply not building enough homes to keep up with potential demand. Only 672,000 new houses were started in April; less than half the long-term run rate needed to meet the nation's natural population growth.
"It is ironic, but there is a growing consensus that there may be a new housing shortage coming," said James Gaines, a real estate economist with Texas A&M". “So far, the shortfall has been masked by a weak economy that has put a damper on home buying. Once the job market rebounds, however, people will look to have their own homes again. This pent-up demand could get unleashed on unprepared markets, causing shortages and rising local prices.”
“Household formation, the technical term for people moving in together, has been on hold during the past few years as young people, especially, have been unable to find jobs. In the past, an average of more than 1.3 million households were formed each year, causing demand for 1.5 million new homes (more homes than households are needed to replace those destroyed by fires, floods, teardowns and neglect.) In 2009, only 398,000 new households were formed, according to the Census Bureau. That is much lower than average and a quarter of the number formed just two years earlier.”
"The decline in household formation is artificial," said Gaines. "The young are moving in with their parents. There's even doubling up among working class people. There's a pent-up demand coming if and when the economy recovers."
Those doubting a new bubble point to a large inventory available. As many as 7 million homes are vacant but not for sale, according to the Census Bureau. That should provide a cushion to offset increased demand. "The housing market hasn't been this way before," said Nicolas Retsinas, director of Harvard's Joint Center for Housing Studies. "The gravity of the problem is deeper and the challenges different. You have to get through that inventory."
The inventory number, however, can be deceiving for two reasons - people may not want to live in hard-hit areas, for example California exurbs and Detroit neighborhoods, or the homes may be beyond repair. "Many of these vacant homes may not be habitable or are in locations where nobody wants to live," Gaines said.
Ordinarily, the nation's homebuilders can react quickly to meet surges in demand. But several factors are preventing them from being nimble. The biggest is the difficulty getting loans, according to Jerry Howard, CEO of the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB). "When we came out of past recessions, there wasn't the difficulty of obtaining financing that there is now," he said. Many small builders have been unable to obtain construction loans or lost their financing in mid-project. That has prodded NAHB to support federal legislation that would make $15 billion in lending guarantees available for private builders.
Too many builders went out of business during the recession, so there will be fewer companies out there to do the building. The survivors will confront a transformed regulatory environment, according to Howard, that will make new homes harder to build and more expensive. "There is an increased focus on smart growth that will create regulatory barriers to the kind of sprawling development that has characterized a lot of recent building," said Retsinas.
Previous overbuilding of one-time boom towns, such as Las Vegas and Miami, should provide enough inventory of like-new homes to counter any strong pent-up demand that breaks free. It's the more constrained markets, where it's particularly hard to build such as New York, San Francisco and Seattle that will field the bulk of the new bubble problems, according to Retsinas. However, he is less worried about the purchase market than about rentals, the usual entree for the young buyers expected to lead the new housing market charge. "Nobody is building any rental inventory," said Retsinas.
Although there is still a surplus of houses for sale in many good areas, it is interesting to see people talking about a shortage in the not too distant future. That in itself is something that no one would have dared to mention, even a few months ago.
C. Cohn
Cohn-Reilly Report
According to the Federal Trade Commission, Countrywide financial Corp, now owned by Bank of America, cheated hundreds of thousands of customers facing foreclosure. The FTC contends that Countrywide took advantage of homeowners by inflating the cost of services for property inspections and foreclosure services by as much as 400 percent. Sadly, I'm not surprised, given the avalanche of fraudulent activities by U.S. corporations these days. To add insult to injury, Countrywide went so far as to overstate the amounts borrowers owed when they were in bankruptcy, and covertly added fees and bogus charges to homeowners’ accounts. For taking advantage of homeowners at their most vulnerable point - when they are facing possible homelessness - these guys should be forced to shut down their operation altogether. These charges demonstrate an egregious act of greed, illustrating how callous some of the mortgage lenders were, which contributed to the breakdown of the housing industry, that nearly brought the country to a standstill. 
I have heard many arguments that place 50% of the blame for the millions of foreclosures on the borrowers. Meanwhile, when you really put in perspective the impact of this kind of organized crime that was sweeping mortgage industry, borrowers didn’t stand a chance against this tidal wave of predatory practices that escalated to fraud in some cases.
